LME Requests Six-Month Delay to Telephone Trading Compliance

The London Metal Exchange (LME) has stated that it will take an extra six months to ensure that trades made via telephone are compliant with new transparency requirements implemented as part of MiFID II. 

The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) initially set a deadline of 1 January 2020 for compliance with the transparency rules set out in MiFID II. 

Most trades made on the LME already adhere to MiFID II’s transparency rules, and waivers apply to most trades which don’t meet the necessary requirements. 

However, ESMA has expressed concern about trades transacted on the LME telephone market. The principal concern here is that bids and offers – that is, pre-trade information – are not published until the final deal has been executed. 

To rectify this, the LME has said that members would accept a ‘systematic fixed price auction’ or ‘FPA’ approach. According to the FPA approach, bids and offers are published, and then trades are actioned following a 30-second delay. 

This approach would ensure compliance with MiFID’s transparency rules. The LME has also claimed that this approach would have the least impact on the market of any alternative. 

However, adopting the FPA approach would entail a range of technical changes to be made which would result in a six-month delay to MiFID II compliance. At present, the LME has said that this system could be in place by mid-2020. 

If ESMA rejects the LME’s proposal, the LME has also said that a ‘manual’ version of this system could be installed in January as a temporary measure. 

Another alternative to the FPA was proposed, but ultimately LME members were not in favour of it. This approach – the customer order and market quoting approach – would result in MiFID compliance, but would also introduce more stages into the trade lifecycle and require members to publish adjustments to fees. The LME expressed concern that this would drive customers away from the LME and to the over-the-counter (OTC) market to avoid higher fees.

Non-Compliance Fines Exceed $36 Billion Since 2008 Financial Crisis

Global financial institutions have been fined over $36 billion since 2008 At the close of the decade, global fines for non-compliance with Anti-Money Laundering (AML), Know your Customer (KYC) and sanctions regulations have exceeded $36 billion since the financial...

FSMA Releases Brochure on MiFID II Investor Protection Rules

FSMA Publishes Educational Brochure on MiFID II Investor Protection The Financial Services and Markets Authority (FSMA) has published a brochure intended to help investors and consumers better understand their rights.  The brochure also outlines what obligations bind...

MiFID III – How Regulatory Bodies Can Improve On MiFID II

REGULATORY MiFID III - How Regulatory Bodies Can Improve On MiFID II It has now been two years since MiFID II was first implemented, and its impact on investors and the markets more generally is gradually becoming clearer.  With this clarity comes a greater...

eflow Shortlisted for TradingTech Insight Awards 2020

eflow Shortlisted for Best Transaction Cost Analysis (TCA) Tool for Best Execution in TradingTech Insight Awards 2020 A-Team's shortlist for their European TradingTech Insight Awards 2020 was announced this week on December 16th. eflow is delighted to announce that we...

Fifth Of UK Fund Managers Admit To Inaccurate Reporting

Fifth Of UK Fund Managers Make Reporting Errors to FCA According to data obtained under an FOI request by Duff & Phelps, approximately one-fifth of all UK fund managers are guilty of making errors in their transaction reporting to the Financial Conduct Authority...

Get In Touch