ESMA Updates Q&As on MiFID II and MiFIR Investor Protection & Intermediaries

ESMA has updated its questions and answers on the implementation of investor protection topics under the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive and Regulation.

On December 4th, the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) published a press release stating that their Q&As on the topic of investor protection and intermediaries under MiFID II and MiFIR has been updated. 

The updated Q&As include more detail on both costs and charges, as well as product intervention. 

ESMA stated that the Q&A on product intervention ‘can assist firms in assessing which national product intervention measures apply in case of services provided on a cross border basis’. This will be particularly relevant to firms dealing with CFDs which are subject to a variety of national product intervention measures.

Along with its press release, ESMA provided a full list of the clarifications which are offered in the updated Q&As: 

  • Best execution;
  • Suitability and appropriateness;
  • Recording of telephone conversations and electronic communications;
  • Post-sale reporting;
  • Record keeping;
  • Investment advice on an independent basis;
  • Inducements (research);
  • Information on charges and costs;
  • Underwriting and placement of a financial instrument;
  • Client categorisation;
  • Inducements;
  • Provision of investment services and activities by third country firms;
  • Application of MiFID II after 3 January 2018, including issues of late transposition; and
  • Other issues
  • Product governance
  • Product intervention

ESMA also states that the new Q&As on investor protection and intermediaries provide clarification on the following: 

  • Information on costs and charges
    • Ex-post information in case of portfolio management
    • Relationship Article 50(9) and Article 60 of the Delegated Regulation in case of portfolio management
  • Product intervention
    • The application of national product intervention measures in case of services provided on a cross-border basis

Quality Control: Is Sampling Effective in Transaction Reporting?

Quality Control: Is Sampling Effective in Transaction Reporting?Ben Parker, CEO and FounderlinkedintwitterFinancial firms face a complex web of regulatory requirements – with transaction reporting undoubtedly taking the crown as one of the most challenging. Firms need...

Regulatory Responses to Algorithmic Trading

Recent events have pushed algorithmic trading to the front of the financial regulatory agenda. We consider what this might mean for automated trading.

David vs. Goliath or Market Abuse? The Regulatory Challenge Posed by GameStop

David vs. Goliath or Market Abuse? - The Regulatory Challenge Posed by GameStopBen Parker, CEO and FounderlinkedintwitterA New Regulatory Challenge Global financial regulators are eyeing up new controls on market manipulation following the widely reported GameStop...

UK, MAR and Market Abuse After Brexit – The New Regime Explained

The UK, MAR and Market Abuse After Brexit - The New Regime ExplainedDouglas Moffat, New Business ExecutivelinkedintwitterMAR and Market Abuse After Brexit Market abuse is a serious concern for financial regulators. It’s why the European Union sought to further codify...

Technology, Compliance & COVID: The 2021 Thomson Reuters Regulatory Report

Technology, Compliance & COVID 19: Unwrapping Thompson Reuters’ 2021 Report on FinTech, RegTech and the Role of Compliance Ben Parker, Director and Founder linkedintwitterAn increased reliance on technology, continued investment in compliance, and predictably...

Get In Touch

[contact-form-7 id="26302" title="AMP Form 2"]
MENU