Global financial institutions have been fined over $36 billion since 2008

At the close of the decade, global fines for non-compliance with Anti-Money Laundering (AML), Know your Customer (KYC) and sanctions regulations have exceeded $36 billion since the financial crisis of 2007-2008. 

2019 saw a sharp increase in regulatory fines levied against financial institutions. Of the $36 billion in fines amassed since 2008, roughly $10 billion of non-compliance fines were awarded in 2019. 

Many of these fines were related to sanctions. 40% of the non-compliance fines enforced in 2019 were related to trade sanctions, amounting to almost $4 billion. Global trade tensions caused by the reverberations from the America-China Trade War are likely to blame for this high number. 

Notably, 2019 also saw a significant amount of fines implemented for non-compliance with the second Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID II) and the Global Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Fines relating to these regulatory frameworks amounted to $82.7 million.

In 2019, the big banks were some of the worst offenders. Of the world’s top 50 banks, 12 were fined for non-compliance with AML, KYC and sanctions violations in 2019. Swiss and Italian banks had the highest value of fines levied against them. Italian banks amassed around $1.5 billion in fines, while Swiss bank UBS was fined a massive $5.1 billion for AML breaches by the French Criminal Court. 

Failures in transaction reporting also accounted for a decent share of the $10 billion in non-compliance fines enforced in 2019. Two significant fines enforced by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) for insufficient transaction reporting in the decade preceding MiFID II account for roughly $81.5 million. 

Taking all these fines into account, 2019 was the second-biggest year for fines levied against financial institutions. With financial regulations becoming continuously more stringent, economists are predicting that 2020 will not see a decrease in non-compliance fines.


Best execution, market abuse and regulatory reporting solutions for financial services, and workflow management for any type of business. All powered by our PATH platform.

Quality Control: Is Sampling Effective in Transaction Reporting?

Quality Control: Is Sampling Effective in Transaction Reporting?Ben Parker, CEO and FounderlinkedintwitterFinancial firms face a complex web of regulatory requirements – with transaction reporting undoubtedly taking the crown as one of the most challenging. Firms need...

Regulatory Responses to Algorithmic Trading

Recent events have pushed algorithmic trading to the front of the financial regulatory agenda. We consider what this might mean for automated trading.

David vs. Goliath or Market Abuse? The Regulatory Challenge Posed by GameStop

David vs. Goliath or Market Abuse? - The Regulatory Challenge Posed by GameStopBen Parker, CEO and FounderlinkedintwitterA New Regulatory Challenge Global financial regulators are eyeing up new controls on market manipulation following the widely reported GameStop...

UK, MAR and Market Abuse After Brexit – The New Regime Explained

The UK, MAR and Market Abuse After Brexit - The New Regime ExplainedDouglas Moffat, New Business ExecutivelinkedintwitterMAR and Market Abuse After Brexit Market abuse is a serious concern for financial regulators. It’s why the European Union sought to further codify...

Technology, Compliance & COVID: The 2021 Thomson Reuters Regulatory Report

Technology, Compliance & COVID 19: Unwrapping Thompson Reuters’ 2021 Report on FinTech, RegTech and the Role of Compliance Ben Parker, Director and Founder linkedintwitterAn increased reliance on technology, continued investment in compliance, and predictably...

Get In Touch

[contact-form-7 id="26302" title="AMP Form 2"]