Global financial institutions have been fined over $36 billion since 2008

At the close of the decade, global fines for non-compliance with Anti-Money Laundering (AML), Know your Customer (KYC) and sanctions regulations have exceeded $36 billion since the financial crisis of 2007-2008. 

2019 saw a sharp increase in regulatory fines levied against financial institutions. Of the $36 billion in fines amassed since 2008, roughly $10 billion of non-compliance fines were awarded in 2019. 

Many of these fines were related to sanctions. 40% of the non-compliance fines enforced in 2019 were related to trade sanctions, amounting to almost $4 billion. Global trade tensions caused by the reverberations from the America-China Trade War are likely to blame for this high number. 

Notably, 2019 also saw a significant amount of fines implemented for non-compliance with the second Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID II) and the Global Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Fines relating to these regulatory frameworks amounted to $82.7 million.

In 2019, the big banks were some of the worst offenders. Of the world’s top 50 banks, 12 were fined for non-compliance with AML, KYC and sanctions violations in 2019. Swiss and Italian banks had the highest value of fines levied against them. Italian banks amassed around $1.5 billion in fines, while Swiss bank UBS was fined a massive $5.1 billion for AML breaches by the French Criminal Court. 

Failures in transaction reporting also accounted for a decent share of the $10 billion in non-compliance fines enforced in 2019. Two significant fines enforced by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) for insufficient transaction reporting in the decade preceding MiFID II account for roughly $81.5 million. 

Taking all these fines into account, 2019 was the second-biggest year for fines levied against financial institutions. With financial regulations becoming continuously more stringent, economists are predicting that 2020 will not see a decrease in non-compliance fines.


Best execution, market abuse and regulatory reporting solutions for financial services, and workflow management for any type of business. All powered by our PATH platform.

FCA Addresses Market Abuse Concerns During COVID-19

FCA Market Watch 63 Addresses Market Conduct During Coronavirus Pandemic  In their latest Market Watch newsletter, the FCA have addressed the importance of proper ‘market conduct and discipline in the context of coronavirus’.  In a direct appeal, Market Watch 63...

Clashes Between EU and UK Asset Managers Over MiFID II Unbundling

Disagreement Over Research Unbundling Between UK and EU Fund Managers As part of the regulatory framework enacted by MiFID II in January of 2018, asset managers were required to separate the cost of research from other costs such as trading commissions. This...

COVID-19 Exposes Gaps in Market Data Supply

Market Data Vendors Struggle to Keep Up Amid Coronavirus Pandemic Since the outbreak of COVID-19 has spread and made its impact known on global markets, a number of banks and investment firms have been required to fall back on Business Continuity Measures (BCP). As a...

Best Execution Reporting During the COVID-19 Pandemic

ESMA Releases Public Statement on MiFID II Best Execution Reporting During COVID-19 Pandemic The disruption to markets caused by preventative lockdowns in response to the Coronavirus pandemic has caused execution venues and firms a great deal of uncertainty with...

ESMA Publishes Opinions on Position Limits under MiFID II

Updated Opinions on Position Limits Under MiFID II Published by ESMA On February 7th, ESMA published seven opinions on position limits regarding commodity derivatives under MiFID II/MiFIR.  The opinions published by ESMA agree with a number of proposed position limits...

Get In Touch