ESMA Releases Public Statement on MiFID II Best Execution Reporting During COVID-19 Pandemic

The disruption to markets caused by preventative lockdowns in response to the Coronavirus pandemic has caused execution venues and firms a great deal of uncertainty with regards to their best execution reporting obligations.

In a statement issued on March 31st, the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has recommended that NCAs do not ‘prioritise supervisory action against execution venues and firms’ while COVID-19 remains a threat, and subsequent actions put in place to prevent its spread remain in place.  

Building on this point, ESMA made the following recommendations with regards to possible timelines: 

  • NCAs should consider that execution venues who would ordinarily be obliged to publish RTS 27 reports by 31 March 2020 ‘may only be able to publish them as soon as reasonably practicable after that date’. ESMA does maintain, however, that these reports should be published no later than the following quarterly RTS 27 reporting deadline (i.e. 30 June 2020)


  • Firms who would ordinarily be obliged to publish an RTS 28 report by 30 April should be given until 30 June 2020 before supervisory action takes place. 

These are, however, simply recommendations; ESMA has encouraged NCAs to not follow these recommendations to the letter of the law, but rather to ‘apply a risk-based approach in the exercise of supervisory powers’ concerning RTS 27 and RTS 28 deadlines. 

CHECK OUT OUR SOLUTIONS

Best execution, market abuse and regulatory reporting solutions for financial services, and workflow management for any type of business. All powered by our PATH platform.

Best Execution and Beyond: What’s Happening to RTS 27 & 28 Post-Brexit?

Best Execution and Beyond: What's Happening to RTS 27 & 28 Post-Brexit?Dougie Moffat, New Business ExecutivelinkedintwitterThe Brexit transition period has now ended, and the UK has severed its legal framework from the EU. For those expecting a marked change in...

Quality Control: Is Sampling Effective in Transaction Reporting?

Quality Control: Is Sampling Effective in Transaction Reporting?Ben Parker, CEO and FounderlinkedintwitterFinancial firms face a complex web of regulatory requirements – with transaction reporting undoubtedly taking the crown as one of the most challenging. Firms need...

Regulatory Responses to Algorithmic Trading

Recent events have pushed algorithmic trading to the front of the financial regulatory agenda. We consider what this might mean for automated trading.

David vs. Goliath or Market Abuse? The Regulatory Challenge Posed by GameStop

David vs. Goliath or Market Abuse? - The Regulatory Challenge Posed by GameStopBen Parker, CEO and FounderlinkedintwitterA New Regulatory Challenge Global financial regulators are eyeing up new controls on market manipulation following the widely reported GameStop...

UK, MAR and Market Abuse After Brexit – The New Regime Explained

The UK, MAR and Market Abuse After Brexit - The New Regime ExplainedDouglas Moffat, New Business ExecutivelinkedintwitterMAR and Market Abuse After Brexit Market abuse is a serious concern for financial regulators. It’s why the European Union sought to further codify...

Get In Touch

[contact-form-7 id="26302" title="AMP Form 2"]
MENU