Market Data Vendors Struggle to Keep Up Amid Coronavirus Pandemic

Since the outbreak of COVID-19 has spread and made its impact known on global markets, a number of banks and investment firms have been required to fall back on Business Continuity Measures (BCP). As a result of this, the lack of preparation by many major financial services institutions has been made evident. 

This lack of preparation is most evident in the world of market data. Speaking to A-Team Insight, an anonymous asset manager has stated that ‘in terms of data management, a lot of the vendors are quite limited in terms of how you can access their data.’ They continued that ‘this could be a prompt to review market data licensing and data acquisition in terms of efficiency under these situations. We are working with the vendors to get around these issues right now, but really it’s a question of speed – can we access what we need when we need it?’ 

This may serve to interfere with the otherwise sound continuity plans that many firms have had in place for years. It seems that the majority of big banks have transitioned fairly smoothly into remote operation. However, if market data supply is interrupted, this could change. 

There is some worry that firms have not sufficiently prepared to access their market data feeds while instigating BCP. Many firms place an undue amount of focus on a site being destroyed without sufficient thought being given to the possibility of staff working entirely remotely, as is the case with Coronavirus. 

Not all market data vendors are equally guilty of this, however. Some vendors provide remote access to their market data feeds via desktop, including eflow’s market data, ICE (the Intercontinental Exchange).  

Despite this, even if market data is made available, banks risk having to pay an estimated 175%-275% more for their market data, including vendor licensing fees, the cost of technology required to host the additional environment and exchange fees.


Best execution, market abuse and regulatory reporting solutions for financial services, and workflow management for any type of business. All powered by our PATH platform.

Quality Control: Is Sampling Effective in Transaction Reporting?

Quality Control: Is Sampling Effective in Transaction Reporting?Ben Parker, CEO and FounderlinkedintwitterFinancial firms face a complex web of regulatory requirements – with transaction reporting undoubtedly taking the crown as one of the most challenging. Firms need...

Regulatory Responses to Algorithmic Trading

Recent events have pushed algorithmic trading to the front of the financial regulatory agenda. We consider what this might mean for automated trading.

David vs. Goliath or Market Abuse? The Regulatory Challenge Posed by GameStop

David vs. Goliath or Market Abuse? - The Regulatory Challenge Posed by GameStopBen Parker, CEO and FounderlinkedintwitterA New Regulatory Challenge Global financial regulators are eyeing up new controls on market manipulation following the widely reported GameStop...

UK, MAR and Market Abuse After Brexit – The New Regime Explained

The UK, MAR and Market Abuse After Brexit - The New Regime ExplainedDouglas Moffat, New Business ExecutivelinkedintwitterMAR and Market Abuse After Brexit Market abuse is a serious concern for financial regulators. It’s why the European Union sought to further codify...

Technology, Compliance & COVID: The 2021 Thomson Reuters Regulatory Report

Technology, Compliance & COVID 19: Unwrapping Thompson Reuters’ 2021 Report on FinTech, RegTech and the Role of Compliance Ben Parker, Director and Founder linkedintwitterAn increased reliance on technology, continued investment in compliance, and predictably...

Get In Touch

[contact-form-7 id="26302" title="AMP Form 2"]