Trade Surveillance Solutions | Regulatory Compliance

All our solutions come with free proof of concept. For more information, click the button below.

regulatory compliance for modern markets

An effective trade surveillance system is key to providing clarity and transparency in today’s global market. With so many regulatory requirements to adhere to, a forward-thinking strategy around trade surveillance and compliance monitoring doesn’t just help you to meet regulations – it can help you surpass them. With the right trade surveillance systems, you can generate insight, reduce the risks of penalties and keep your firm competitive.

the core modules of tz

Our TZ system is comprised of three core modules, each of which is designed specifically to help your firm achieve total regulatory compliance. The three core modules of TZ are:

Market Abuse

TZ for Market Abuse is a solution that’s both comprehensive and flexible, and gives your firm full compliance with MAD, MAD II and MAR.

Best Execution

TZ for Best Execution gives firms access to instant reporting and analysis, and offers bespoke solutions for all varieties of financial firm.

TCA (Transaction Cost Analysis)

TZ for Transaction Cost Analysis Solution helps firms to understand helps firms to understand whether the correct procedure was followed in line with MiFID II regulations and your best execution policy

why choose tz

TZ for Trade Surveillance or Market Abuse is our comprehensive solution for efficient trade surveillance and compliance monitoring. It helps firms meet best practice requirements for regulatory reporting and market manipulation detection, and is fully customisable to meet your specific trade surveillance needs.

With the Trade Surveillance or Market Abuse product, you can enjoy all the benefits of an off-the-shelf solution with a flexible, tailored bespoke service.

TZ for Trade Surveillance or Market Abuse is fully compliant with the requirements set out in the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID I and II) and the Market Abuse Directive (MAD I and II), as well as North America’s Dodd Frank Reform, Volcker Rule and Market Abuse Directive.

LME Requests Six-Month Delay to Telephone Trading Compliance

LME Requests Six-Month Delay to Telephone Trading Compliance The London Metal Exchange (LME) has stated that it will take an extra six months to ensure that trades made via telephone are compliant with new transparency requirements implemented as part of MiFID II. The European Securities and...

MiFID II Unbundling Relief Period Extended to 2023 by SEC

MiFID II Unbundling Relief Period Extended to 2023 by SEC The US Securities and Exchange Commission has granted a three-year extension to the MiFID II relief period for American firms. The SEC will allow US brokers to continue bundling execution and research payments for another three years. In...

ESMA Launches Consultation Paper on Position Limits in Commodity Derivatives

ESMA Launches Consultation Paper on Position Limits and Position Management in Commodity Derivatives ESMA has launched a consultation paper intended to gather information on the ‘impact of position limits on liquidity, market abuse and orderly pricing and settlement conditions in commodity...

Communication Recording and MiFID II: How To Stay Compliant

MiFID II Communication Reporting: Stay Compliant As part of MiFID II’s aim to generate greater market transparency, firms are now required to record all voice communications which result in a transaction being completed. These requirements extend to include trades made by telephone, text, any kind...

ESMA Updates Transparency Calculations For Equity And Equity-Like Instruments

ESMA Updates Results of Annual Transparency Calculations for Equity and Equity-Like Instruments On September 23rd, ESMA began to make available the updated annual transparency calculations for equity and equity-like instruments. ESMA has claimed that these updated results will account for and aim...